TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Readability - CD/web site From:"Cassandra Greer" <cassandra -at- greer -dot- de> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Wed, 3 May 2006 09:05:29 +0200 (MEST)
May I add my own (anecdotal) two euro cents:
Oh the headaches I had in the days when I had to use monitors that were
green/white text on a black background! I need light (ask my husband -'Turn
on the lights, dang it!' and have even resorted to bringing a lamp when
working on site. Give me black text (at least 12 pt for my 1024x769 px
screen) on a white (or very light) background anyday! I prefer serif fonts
(e.g., palatino is my favorite :) but am not a stickler about it.
Cass the blind (who only stays on a dark site if she absolutely has to but
runs away as soon as possible)
> I know the studies that I, myself, have done. Personally, I have
> difficulty reading anything at all on a dark background. It
> is somehow artistic, I imagine, to use black on dark brown, or
> dark red on dark blue (or vice-versa). My studies reveal that
> a dark background leads me into taking a particular set of actions:
> 1. If the website is unimportant, I look elsewhere, or and go brush
> the horses, or darn socks, or do some other pleasant activity.
> 2. If it has truly necessary information, I try "select all" to
> see if some sort of reversal improves legibility. If that
> fails I try copying the text and pasting it into Emacs or
> some other editor. Perhaps instead I try opening the website
> with lynx; or maybe I edit the HTML source, correcting the
> colors, and save it onto my own machine so I can try reading
> it as it should have appeared.
> I wonder what actions others may take. Do they curse sliently, or
> maybe throw shoes? Do they involve anyone who'll listen in a
> rant about lousy web design? Do they go and get drunk, or at
> least go raid the candy machine?
> Dark red on dark blue generates a peculiarly high level of eyestrain,
> because the eye must try to focus on two wavelengths that differ by
> nearly half an octave. Tiny type is harder than larger. The efceft
> cluod be made wsroe olny by jmulibg the lteters in all the wrdos.
> The purpose of using the dark background eludes me. Perhaps the
> webmaster desires power over the reader. Perhaps he has a fondness
> for bathing-machines, which he constantly carries about, and
> believes that the add to the beauty of scenes, a sentiment open
> to doubt.
> Nelson, Julie wrote:
> > My team is developing a marketing CD for our retail computer system.
> > We're in the initial stages of developing the layout for the main
> > navigation/home page. So far, we've developed 2 different layouts. One
> > has a white background, black text, navigation buttons with a red border
> > at the top, a few images & the very top of the page has the company &
> > computer system logos with a black background behind it. The other
> > layout has a black background, white text, the same company & computer
> > system logos with a black background & a few images. It might just be
> > my eyesight, but it's more challenging for me to read the white text on
> > a black background than black text on a white background (or maybe this
> > is just what my eyes are used to).
> > Do you know of any readability studies available on the web that
> > reference what background color/font color/font size & type is easiest
> > to read on a CD or web site. Our long term goal is to include a good
> > deal of this content on our intranet site, so it would be helpful if the
> > CD & web site had a similar layout. I'm researching this on Google, but
> > I thought I'd check here too. I'm guessing I could find something on
> > Jakob Nielsen's site.
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l