TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Did I overreact? From:"Ron Hearn" <RHearn -at- cucbc -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Tue, 30 May 2006 15:09:02 -0700
Part of the problem is I think is that there are employers out there
that don't have a clue what a TW is paid, especially ones hiring their
From: John Posada [mailto:jposada01 -at- yahoo -dot- com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 3:03 PM
To: Ron Hearn; TECHWR-L
Subject: RE: Did I overreact?
> In other words, when such calls are received, it's best
> to politely turn down the recruiter without burning any
> bridges and even set the stage
> for a better position should one come up.
Exactly. Are we SO sensitive about our credibility that we are
outraged if anyone should have the temerity to even think that we'd
stoop so low?
Recruiter throws out a number ($24). We throw out an alternative
($50). The recruiter will probably say no...the difference is too
wide. OTOH, maybe ups the number ($30). We either say yes, no, or we
throw out another number ($45). The first time someone says "No,
sorry, bye", the call is over.
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l