TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Time Zone Debate From:Lou Quillio <public -at- quillio -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Tue, 30 May 2006 22:42:26 -0400
Lisa Dugger wrote:
> Which is the correct usage of listing multiple business hours
> with a time zone?
Not a matter of "correct", rather "clear". First thing we need to
know are the days, next the times, then the time-zone clarification.
You don't want to say "Central `Standard` Time" or "CST", just
"Central Time" or "CT": let the reader correct for daylight
savings. Depending on audience, it can sometimes be clearer to just
say "Chicago time" or "(Chicago, U.S.)".
Why no spaces/periods in the time (8:00 A.M.)? It's visual noise,
and there's no clarity advantage. Same with minutes. Include 'em
if they matter, forget 'em if they don't.
Is "CT" unclear? Maybe, but probably not. I see the days. Got it.
I see the times. Got it. Wait. They may not be in my time zone.
"CT" probably answers that (because there's a pattern of descending
significance). If I'm on Central Time, I already know what's up.
If I'm not, I know I need to check it.
In doubt? Spell out "Central Time". Global reach? "U.S. Central
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l