Re: cluetrain, derailed. New engine?

Subject: Re: cluetrain, derailed. New engine?
From: Milan Davidovic <shl_ctf -at- yahoo -dot- ca>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:41:47 -0400 (EDT)

--- Peter Neilson <neilson -at- alltel -dot- net> wrote:
> Perhaps it would be good to end discussion of this
> stupid topic and
> return to the main business at hand, which is How Do
> I Convince Possible
> Clients That They Need Tech Writing and that they
> need *me* to do it
> for them?

Perhaps when current and past clients start talking up
how glad they are that they had tech writing, CM, etc.

Admittedly, that's a stretch.

Here's a question: can anyone give examples of clients
doing this? Or, at the very least, non-technical
communicators thumping the tub for technical


Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around

WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!.

Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter. It's that easy. Watch the demo at

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Re: cluetrain, derailed. New engine?: From: Peter Neilson

Previous by Author: style guile (was: Using a warning notice for Television Owner's Manuals)
Next by Author: Looking for desktop slideshow
Previous by Thread: Re: cluetrain, derailed. New engine?
Next by Thread: Re: cluetrain, derailed. New engine?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads