TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
On Monday 12 June 2006 18:56, Rebecca Stevenson wrote:
> >> > No takers. But it was also interesting to see that all
> >> > serious comment was off-list. I wonder what that says.
> I think it says that most of us think our responses to the topic are, well,
> off-topic. Aside from justifiable critiques of the writing and organization
> (or lack), responses are going to be philophical and possibly emotional.
Judging by the two conversations I am having on this thread, one on the other
off list, I think you may be right on this.
The lack of organization and writing style are not my focus in this instance.
What interests me are the ideas and thinking. I wonder if it is possible to
embrace, in whole or in part, the thinking captured in this work and apply it
I guess it is not a common practice and yet a client wants to see many of
these ideas reflected in their communications. For example:
24. Bombastic boastsâ"We are positioned to become the preeminent provider of
XYZ"âdo not constitute a position.
My client even forbids a statement like, "XYZ is the market leader in ABC."
Frankly this has thrown me for a six, hence my question on this subject.
Ask me about the Monkey.
sean -at- inwords -dot- co -dot- za
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l