Re: Wikipedia

Subject: Re: Wikipedia
From: "Bryan Sherman" <bsherm -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: hokumhome -at- freehomepage -dot- com
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 10:31:27 -0400

Actually, I realized that was the KEY point based on a discussion with
someone else offline. Most of the criticisms for Wikipedia can be
placed on just about any source of info.


On 7/19/06, Sean Hower <hokumhome -at- freehomepage -dot- com> wrote:

Bryan Sherman wrote:
Personally I find Wikipedia a mixed bag, and certainly take any
entries on controversial figures and/or subjects with a HUGE grain of
As one should do with any source of information, regardless of origin. Universities and peer-reviewed journals can be just as wrong as Wikipedia or Joe-Bob's blog. :-)


WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content delivery. Try it today!.
Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter. It's that easy. Watch the demo at

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Re: Wikipedia: From: Sean Hower

Previous by Author: Re: Wikipedia
Next by Author: Re: Fwd: translation
Previous by Thread: Re: Wikipedia
Next by Thread: RE: Wikipedia

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads