Subject:Re: OT: Wikipedia as a reference source From:Sankara R <ss_rajanala -at- yahoo -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Fri, 28 Jul 2006 05:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
Stuart wrote...
> assumptions. Does that remind you of anything?
> It's just like techwr-l!
There is possibly one difference: one gets to
know people who write on techwr-l, and know what
to expect and how to take it.
We have our own opinions, assumptions, and
prejudices about those people - we are entitled
to those (nor can we help holding them).
Sure those articles on wiki are written by real
people, and if we see several of their articles -
and we know some of the topics with authority -
then we can form a prejudice about their level of
ignorance or knowledge too.
We don't usually run into the same 'author'
often; that is the likely difference?
Sankara S Rajanala
+91 98863 12366
----------------
Tina: I am an experienced technical writer.
You are an intern and a rodent, respectively.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l