RE: browseable vs browsable

["Jessica Weissman" <Jessica -dot- Weissman -at- hillcrestlabs -dot- com>]

Thanks to all who have confirmed that browsable is the better choice
between the two spellings.

I agree that it is jargon, but jargon is precisely what is needed here,
as we are distinguishing among several types of
find/browse/graze/discover/serendipitize/stumble over in describing some
content consumption modes for our user interface.

The document audience will be fully jargon-capable.  It's not for a user
guide or anything else that will be read by regular users.

Jessica Weissman
Hillcrest Laboratories

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular Help file format or printed documentation. Learn more at http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot- 

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40infoinfocus.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.