TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: MS Word readability index From:Maggie_Secara -at- capgroup -dot- com To:"VERKERKEN Wouter" <Wouter -dot- VERKERKEN -at- swift -dot- com> Date:Tue, 19 Sep 2006 09:24:06 -0700
I find this to be true. I have yet to have anyone--even the gurus before
whom I bow on Word-PC--give me an answer. It should work on any document,
on any text, as long as it's not set to "no proofing". But it doesn't
always. However, someone recently sent me a macro that does the more or
less the4 same thing: word count and Flech/Flesch-Kinkaid reading scores.
It's supposed to count passive sentences too, but it always comers up 0
even when I KNOW there is a passive construction. And it always works.
I can share it off list if you like.
"VERKERKEN Wouter" <Wouter -dot- VERKERKEN -at- swift -dot- com>wrote on 09/19/2006 05:50:28
> Anyone = ever used the readability index feature (Flesch score
> etc.) and found that it seems to = work on some documents, but not
> on other? I mean: on some documents you get the = index, and on
> some documents you don't, while you have requested it in exactly = the
> same way. Weird.