Re: Engineer vs. engineer

Subject: Re: Engineer vs. engineer
From: Milan Davidovic <shl_ctf -at- yahoo -dot- ca>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:30:20 -0400 (EDT)

--- eric -dot- dunn -at- ca -dot- transport -dot- bombardier -dot- com wrote:
> but Microsoft was
> found guilty of encouraging and promoting the false
> use of the title
> engineer.

FWIW, the linked document says that the decision is
under appeal; I guess that hasn't been decided yet.


Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around

WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!

Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular Help file format or printed documentation. Learn more at

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Engineer vs. engineer: From: eric . dunn

Previous by Author: RE: Doc Control
Next by Author: Re: question about resumes
Previous by Thread: Engineer vs. engineer
Next by Thread: Re: Engineer vs. engineer

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads