Subject:RE: Symbol Font Considered Harmful From:"Andrew Warren" <awarren -at- synaptics -dot- com> To:"Fred Ridder" <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com>, <mike -at- writestarr -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:10:30 -0800
Fred Ridder wrote:
> the lower-case mu .... is character 181 (0xB5) in the
> ISO-8859-1 character set, .... so I suppose this makes
> the mu a Unicode character in one sense, but Unicode
> encoding is *not* required to handle a mu in any
> normal application
True. That's why I prefer that character, which the
Unicode spec actually calls "micro", to the (usually
identical-looking) one that it calls "mu", for which
Unicode encoding IS required.
> I disagree with the opinion that Symbol font is a greater
> evil and causes more problems than Unicode. For example,
> a number of applications in wide use (e.g. FrameMaker)
> do not (yet?) support Unicode at all
Hmm... In my caffeine-fueled rush to post my rant, I
might have left out a couple of sentences that would
have clarified my point.
In my opinion, an application that doesn't support
my font at all -- whether its lack of support is
demonstrated by missing symbols, symbols replaced by
little black boxes, or even outright crashes -- is
VASTLY preferable to an application that sneaks
through my document and silently multiplies all numbers
in it by 1000.
Lack of Unicode support can be seen; once seen, it can
be corrected or worked around. The mu-to-m error CAN'T
be seen; it just silently happens, and no one knows
about it until parts stop fitting together, or products
start failing, or a million pieces of the wrong
component get ordered, etc.
> if your deliverables are PDF files that have the fonts
> embedded (which should be standard practice IMO) there is
> no downside to using Symbol font.
True... UNLESS the mu-to-m error happens BEFORE the
conversion to PDF. Judging from the number of omega-to-W
errors I see in PDFs and in published books and articles,
this happens all the time.
-Andrew
=== Andrew Warren - awarren -at- synaptics -dot- com
=== Synaptics, Inc - Santa Clara, CA
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular Help file format or printed documentation. Learn more at http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-
