We are currently reviewing our documentation processes and are looking to get some feedback about how other teams/companies handle reviewing their documentation.
Do you have a process for reviewing/testing/proofreading documentation?
What do you review in the documentation? Content, grammar, layout, style (both wording and/or applying templates), or functionality of the Help (other documentation)?
Who reviews the documentation? Another technical writer, editor, proofreader, SME?
Do you use any sort of defecting tracking software?
Do you provide the reviewer with anything explaining the changes in the documentation?
Any information is much appreciated!
Thanks,
Annie
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-