re: Readability Question

Subject: re: Readability Question
From: Milan Davidovic <shl_ctf -at- yahoo -dot- ca>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:10:07 -0500 (EST)

--- Sean Hower <hokumhome -at- freehomepage -dot- com> wrote:
> Those basic premises are your foundation for
> your argueing that certain methods of readability,
> those that use word length and sentence length, do
> provide worthwhile data upon which to make
> decisions. Of course, if this isn't what you're
> saying, then I take it back. ;-)

Have another venti -- what I'm arguing is that there
are better ways to *test whether* readability formulae
are worthwhile. I'm not saying they're worthwhile,
just how I think we should investigate the issue.

Sorry if that wasn't clear.


Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around

WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

re: Readability Question: From: Sean Hower

Previous by Author: re: Readability Question
Next by Author: documenting games redux
Previous by Thread: re: Readability Question
Next by Thread: Re: Readability Question

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads