Re: Typographical conventions

Subject: Re: Typographical conventions
From: "Kevin Amery" <kevindamery -at- gmail -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:04:26 -0400

On 3/12/07, Janice Gelb <janice -dot- gelb -at- sun -dot- com> wrote:
> Seems to me that the answer to this problem is to
> put the procedural information in numbered steps,
> not to litter the paragraph with bold. or more resources and info.

I agree. My personal rule of thumb is, if there are three or more
steps, make it a list.

Until next time...

Kevin Amery

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output.

Now shipping: Help &amp; Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help &amp; Manual:

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


RE: Typographical conventions: From: Harry Bacheler
Re: Typographical conventions: From: Janice Gelb

Previous by Author: Re: Typographical conventions
Next by Author: Re: Pet Peeves
Previous by Thread: Re: Typographical conventions
Next by Thread: RE: Typographical conventions

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads