TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Giving Up on XML From:"Gordon McLean" <Gordon -dot- McLean -at- GrahamTechnology -dot- com> To:<techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:48:52 -0000
Imagine for a moment that you had no publishing or editing software. How
much time will it take to select a product, set it up, and then design your
templates for it? How long will it take you to learn the TOC features and
scripting possibilities? How much will it take to get the workflow right so
that you produce consistent professional results?
-----End of Original Message-----
Ouch. Your foot must hurt.
Switching from one desktop publishing application to another is not that
huge a leap. I've gone from nothing to Word, to FrameMaker and recently to
InDesign with comparatively little downtime.
Why? Because those tools already take care of the file level information.
Sure I COULD learn about how a .doc file is technically structured
(presuming MS allows such a thing), just as I once did for Postscript files.
But I don't need to, the tool takes care of that for me, leaving me to worry
about working practises and, you know, the content.
YES I think XML has many advantages.
But until there is an application that offers the ease of use that something
like Word, or InDesign, has, in other words an application that hides the
highly technical 'stuff' and allows me to leverage the benefits of single
sourcing from XML, then it will remain just another option for those people
who have the time and inclination to learn it.
I have some inclination (and some understanding already) but I cannot invest
A side thought: Is the popularity of RoboHelp because it's the best, or
because it could take in multiple formats INCLUDING FrameMaker??
The first XML vendor who gives me a layer of abstraction AND allows me to
'easily' migrate my content wins, says I.
Am I neglecting my company by not future proofing my content? Maybe and at
some point their will be a BUSINESS need for me to address that, I just
don't think that time is here and now. XML in publishing seems to be stalled
at the 'early adopter' stage, I'm still waiting for the tipping point.
Just my tuppence,
This email (and any attachments) is private and confidential, and is intended solely for the
addressee. If you have received this communication in error please remove it and inform us via
telephone or email. Although we take all possible steps to ensure mail and attachments
are free from malicious content, malware and viruses, we cannot accept any responsibility
whatsoever for any changes to content outwith our administrative bounds. The views represented
within this mail are solely the view of the author and do not reflect the views of the organisation
as a whole.
Graham Technology plc
Registered in Scotland company no. SC143434
Registered Office India of Inchinnan, Renfrewshire, Scotland PA4 9LH
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
Now shipping: Help & Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help & Manual: http://www.helpandmanual.com
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-