RE: Actual Site Stats - Firefox 2 versus IE 7

Subject: RE: Actual Site Stats - Firefox 2 versus IE 7
From: "Gordon McLean" <Gordon -dot- McLean -at- GrahamTechnology -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 07:54:45 +0100

If coded (if, IF!!) a CSS layout should always degrade well enough to allow
user to access the important stuff. Yes there are some quirks and bugs to
note when using CSS layout but from my knowledge the majority of them are
due to the way IE (badly) interprets CSS positioning and the box model.

There are plenty of examples of websites coded to W3 standards which appear
as expected in all browsers bar IE (whereas the reverse doesn't seem to be
the case). Web standards are, on the whole, a good thing but some people to
get a bit antsy about them. They are not the be all and end all. They SHOULD
be but as noted in this thread, the political machinations have stripped the
W3 of some of it's usefulness.

Ultimately it is very very possible to code a webpage using CSS and DIVs for
layout, and have it degrade across multiple browsers (all the way down to
text only representations). is a good starting point if you want to know

However I'd still like to see some examples of "other applications of CSS
layout, forms and miscellany" please.


-----Original Message-----
While your site is a nice-looking one, it's a standard style of layout.
Other applications of CSS layout, forms and miscellany display differently,
and often in an obviously visually broken fashion, between browsers.

--- Char James-Tanny <charjtf -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:

> > And yet with that method, possibly even more inconsistencies exist
> > between the two major
> browsers.
> Such as...???
> I figure that most clients/customers/users aren't going to compare
> sites in multiple browsers to see what's different (although my site,
>, looks relatively similar in all browsers from what I
> can tell). But without more information, I'm not sure what I'm missing
> here.

This email (and any attachments) is private and confidential, and is intended solely for the
addressee. If you have received this communication in error please remove it and inform us via
telephone or email. Although we take all possible steps to ensure mail and attachments
are free from malicious content, malware and viruses, we cannot accept any responsibility
whatsoever for any changes to content outwith our administrative bounds. The views represented
within this mail are solely the view of the author and do not reflect the views of the organisation
as a whole.
Graham Technology plc
Registered in Scotland company no. SC143434
Registered Office India of Inchinnan, Renfrewshire, Scotland PA4 9LH


Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output.

Now shipping: Help &amp; Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help &amp; Manual:

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Re: Actual Site Stats - Firefox 2 versus IE 7: From: Chris Borokowski

Previous by Author: RE: Actual Site Stats - Firefox 2 versus IE 7
Next by Author: RE: Actual Site Stats - Firefox 2 versus IE 7
Previous by Thread: Re: Actual Site Stats - Firefox 2 versus IE 7
Next by Thread: Re: Actual Site Stats - Firefox 2 versus IE 7

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads