Hard to justify in terms of bottom line but true

Subject: Hard to justify in terms of bottom line but true
From: Chris Borokowski <athloi -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 07:31:14 -0700 (PDT)

I've seen this in every well-managed place where I've worked. I've been
fortunate (or not) to work at a range of companies, with some being
zeroes on the management scale and others quite impressive.

This truism goes unrecognized because it's hard to prove bottom line,
although quality of product is noticably better when people are not
burnt-out zombies. Here's another:

Good documentation (readability, completeness, organization) = happy
users = return customers = productive + profitable company

--- Damien Braniff <Damien -dot- Braniff -at- asg -dot- com> wrote:

> I guess what I'm saying is that a good company (environment, pay,
> hours
> - the whole package) = happy staff = productive + profitable company.

technical writing | consulting | development

Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today! http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7


Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.


RE: 40-hour weeks: From: Damien Braniff

Previous by Author: RE: 40-hour weeks (was Re: FWD: Lack...)
Next by Author: Re: Paths to Seniority - from technical support to technical writing?
Previous by Thread: RE: 40-hour weeks
Next by Thread: Re: Hard to justify in terms of bottom line but true

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads