RE: software control terms (back to the original Topic)
Subject:RE: software control terms (back to the original Topic) From:"Butler, Darren J Ctr 584 CBSS/GBHAC" <Darren -dot- Butler -dot- ctr -at- Robins -dot- af -dot- mil> To:<techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:49:20 -0400
>an subjective art (??!!)
Sure, I write for a living.
Like most of us, I often battle with some of my technical customers over verbs (and don't-get-me-started on adverbs like "gradually") such as "choose". Since most of these folks aren't the target audience for my documents, they usually lose the debate. How they want me to say something isn't always the way my readers will understand it.
(Back to the Original Topic).
I'm curious to hear from authors who use rendering conventions to differentiate between on-screen items (e.g. buttons, check-boxes and screen titles), function keys (e.g. Enter, F3 and spacebar), and entries that are to be typed. My office has settled on a convention that seems to work for our software customers but I'd like to know how others are writing software documents.
Are you using visual markers such as boxed words or bolded words; or are you using consistent terms such as:
-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+darren -dot- butler -dot- ctr=robins -dot- af -dot- mil -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+darren -dot- butler -dot- ctr=robins -dot- af -dot- mil -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of Butler, Darren J Ctr 584 CBSS/GBHAC
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 3:10 PM
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: FW: software control terms -- To "choose" is passive?
Subject: RE: software control terms -- To "choose" is passive?
So....entreators can't be selectors?
Hey, I did write "in my view" and "IMHO."
Even though our subject matter is usually scientific, the means of coveying the material is often an subjective art and that is driven by the undertanding of the audience or the prefferance of the author. This sort of thing drives my trainee crazy. I end up having to edit his work because I have more experience with the target audience and the writing style of the local office. Ocasionally, we've all had to choke-down being garmmatically correct in order to ensure a paying customer understood what-the-heck button they needed to push ;-).
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-