Re: Inflammable vs. flammable

Subject: Re: Inflammable vs. flammable
From: "Bill Swallow" <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "Tariel, Lauren R" <lt34 -at- saclink -dot- csus -dot- edu>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:18:09 -0400

> Shouldn't that be "irresponsibleless" or "ir-irresponsible" or something else with double-negative?

How about "irresponsibility"? Kinda adds an important tone to being a
ditz. ;-) And I noticed that my spill chucker didn't flag that term,
so it must be good to go!

Bill Swallow
HATT List Owner
WWP-Users List Owner
Senior Member STC, TechValley Chapter
STC Single-Sourcing SIG Manager

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity!

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Inflammable vs. flammable: From: Cardimon, Craig
RE: Inflammable vs. flammable: From: Ron Hearn
RE: Inflammable vs. flammable: From: Tariel, Lauren R

Previous by Author: Re: Inflammable vs. flammable
Next by Author: Re: Service Mark
Previous by Thread: RE: Inflammable vs. flammable
Next by Thread: Re: Inflammable vs. flammable

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads