RE: Document Naming Conventions

Subject: RE: Document Naming Conventions
From: "Dan Goldstein" <DGoldstein -at- riverainmedical -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:22:16 -0500

Dori and I have both worked under FDA and ISO. A few years ago, my
company happily switched from "meaningful" document ID numbers to simple
numbers backed by a spreadsheet (not even a database!).

I like having a document control procedure that I can easily show,
explain, and justify to an auditor -- preferably, in less time than it
takes to prepare the next infusion of sugar and caffeine.

Still, I am ever mindful of Eli Lapp: "There is never only one way." The
previous document control procedure with "meaningful" numbers was fully
compliant -- but also cumbersome and complex.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: neilson
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 1:54 PM
> To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: Re: Document Naming Conventions
> Dori admonishes:
> > Previous discussions on this list have warned _strongly_ against
> > trying to make document identification numbers somehow "meaningful".
> I totally agree, having been involved with documents that had
> "meaningful" numbers. Here are some further ideas:
> - There is something to be said for a system that uses long
> numbers that are self-verifying...

This message contains confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing, copying, electronic storing or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us, by replying to the sender, and delete the original message immediately thereafter. Thank you.


Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity!

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Re: Document Naming Conventions: From: neilson

Previous by Author: Upgrading to Acrobat 8?
Next by Author: RE: STC Salary data collection
Previous by Thread: Re: Document Naming Conventions
Next by Thread: Re: Document Naming Conventions

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads