## Re: Fig. vs Figs.?

Subject: Re: Fig. vs Figs.?
To: "Geoff Hart" <ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 23:50:52 +0900

I should have given a little more context to my question "Is the word figure
singular or plural in-text
when describing alphabetically labeled divisions of a single numbered
figure? EXAMPLES *Fig. 12 (a), (b), and (c) shows* OR Figs. 12 *(a),
(b), and (c) show "

abreviation "Fig." is the norm with or without parentheses.

*"This definition (6) may also be useful to attenuate small-scale
discontinuities or to take into account some geometrical features of the
images under study, see Figs. 3b and 3c."*
Also, it is fairly common practice to include a number of images in a single
numbered figure. This is probably a space saving device given the size
limitations of scientific articles. For example, there are three images in
Fig. 4 here:

*Fig. 4. (a)* Example of a realization of a CPC Q' (gray levels) with ð2Þ '
0:16—see (12) about the role of ð2Þ.* (b)* Estimated (log)histograms of
normalized wavelet coefficients at various octaves j: they are all clearly
non-Gaussian (Gaussian ) parabola).* (c) *Power law spectrum of Q'ðxÞ as a
function of k ¼ kkk over two decades: the observed slope is prescribed by
the choice of ð2Þ.* [some formatting may be lost. Bolding added]*

SOURCE:
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/34/4375367/04359289.pdf?isnumber=4375367&prod=JNL&arnumber=4359289&arSt=2105&ared=2119&arAuthor=Chainais%2C+Pierre

There does not seem to be any difference between refering to one figure
containing multiple images and separately numbered figures. Logically, there
should be a difference. Here are some text samples from different published
papers.

- *It can also be seen, by comparing Figs. 5(b) and 6(a),*
- *in Figs. 4 (a)–(c).
*
- *Typical analytical models are shown in Figs. 4 and 5. Some of the
failure mode shapes are shown in Fig. 6.*

I like Geoff's solution here. I have just abbreviated the word Figure.
"Fig. 12 (a, b, and c) shows"

We also know that published papers don't always show best practices, but I
would like to give guidelines to my graduate engineering students.

On 11/20/07, Geoff Hart <ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca> wrote:
>
> Adam Turner wondered: <<Is the word figure singular or plural in-text
> when describing alphabetically labeled divisions of a single numbered
> figure? EXAMPLES *Fig. 12 (a), (b), and (c) shows* OR Figs. 12 *(a),
> (b), and (c) show *>>
>
> Most style guides I've seen (specifically, the author guidelines
> published online by science journals) do not allow the abbreviation
> of "Figure" outside of brackets*, and few seem to use the brackets
> for the sub-figures. So I'd right this (and write this <grin>) as
> "Figure 12 shows". Note that there's only one figure, not three.
>
> * Nor do they permit the use of most abbreviations that require
> punctuation outside of brackets. This is for a very good reason: the
> period introduces needless punctuation and thus, creates needless
> complexity, in the sentence. Occasionally, it even makes the sentence
> significantly more difficult to parse.
>
> If you need the three letters (i.e., they are only three of many more
> sub-figures), try: "Figure 12 (a, b, and c) shows". Better still,
> don't cite more than one sub-figure when the meaning is only present
> in one. For example: "Figure 12a shows X, [Figure] 12b shows Y, and
> [Figure] 12c shows Z." Whether to repeat the word "Figure" is a style
> decision, but my take on this is that the further apart each number,
> the more useful the repetition becomes.
>
> Also note (as it's not a trivial point) that using the full word only
> adds two characters to the total length once you delete the period,
> so it's not like the abbreviation offers any advantage over the
> unabbreviated form. Engineers and scientists love their abbreviations
> far too well, and we sometimes fall into the trap of adopting their
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> -- Geoff Hart
> ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca / geoffhart -at- mac -dot- com
> www.geoff-hart.com
> --------------------------------------------------
> ***Now available*** _Effective onscreen editing_
> (http://www.geoff-hart.com/home/onscreen-book.htm)
>
>
>

--

Director
English Writing Center
Hanyang University
Center for Teaching and Learning
Seoul, Korea
http://ctl.hanyang.ac.kr/writing/

"If we knew what we were doing, we wouldn't call it research."
—Albert Einstein
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Follow-Ups:

References:
Fig. vs Figs.: From: Adam Turner
Fig. vs Figs.?: From: Geoff Hart

Previous by Author: Fig. vs Figs.
Next by Author: RE: Punctuation question
Previous by Thread: Fig. vs Figs.?
Next by Thread: Fig. vs Figs.? (take II)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues: