Subject:RE: is more verbiage needed? From:Karen Mulholland <kemulholland -at- yahoo -dot- com> To:"Combs, Richard" <richard -dot- combs -at- Polycom -dot- com>, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
No, I read the whole thing.
But why demand that extra click?
Strip the information down to what a reader needs
right now, and make that whole logical chunk available
right there. Don't ask the reader to do any more work
than absolutely necessary.
When a spare topic is the gateway to three small and
similar topics, it's often a sign to streamline the
document structure by presenting the "target" topics
all in one place. In this instance, the information
would probably work well as a table.
>
> Karen, you stopped reading Leonard's description too
> soon.
(snip)
>
> > Except for the header, each phrase is a hyperlink
> that expands a table
>
> > containing the application's OS, hardware, and
> software requirements
> > for each platform.
>
> Those three OS names are merely the gateway to
> details regarding that
> platform (including OS requirements).
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-