TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: active vs. passive voice From:"Sean Brierley" <sbrierley -at- Accu-Time -dot- com> To:<techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:12:38 -0400
Grammar gets a lot of interest in here, doesn't it?
Active voice: the subject performs the action: Joe dropped the laptop.
The actor is known.
Passive voice: the subject receives the action: The laptop was dropped.
The actor is often unknown or is (revealed, appears, displays, shown)
using a "by" phrase: The laptop was dropped by Joe.
In the U.S., we prefer the active because it tends to be more clear and
concise than the passive. However, the passive has some useful
functions, such as avoiding the assignment of blame or deemphasizing the
actor when the actor is irrelevant. Of course, we use the imperative
mood a fair bit, too.
I believe using the passive in moderation is fine in technical
communication, including training, reference, and online documentation.
Above all, be consistent with your style guide.
While we are on the subject, I avoid the future tense when possible.
That's not because the future is hypothetical, or evil, I just prefer to
keep the documentation simple, and using fewer tenses is simpler.
What do I write?
Click File > Save as. The Save as dialog box opens.
Why? I find the imperative mood for the action is concise and clear, and
some description of the result of the action often helps the audience. I
use > as my convention for a string of menu selections. | works well, I
just don't use it, and -> is mighty fancy, but extra typing, etc.
Cheers,
Sean
___________
Sean Brierley
Technical Writer
www.accu-time.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
