Re: Pilot Editing Study?

Subject: Re: Pilot Editing Study?
From: Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
To: Geoff Hart <ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 09:18:15 -0400

Geoff Hart wrote:
> ... [Lots of on-target stuff]

But he omitted the skill, whatever it is, that allows one to find or
negotiate into a position that actually pays what the work is worth.

Editorial work is generally considered to be something like paint. Your
building will be better if it's painted, but you can get along for a
year or so if it isn't, or if you merely use the much cheaper whitewash.

Also, we don't want it right, we want it Monday.

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity!

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Pilot Editing Study: From: Ali Ferguson
Pilot Editing Study?: From: Geoff Hart

Previous by Author: Re: Lean Six Sigma Black Belt or Green Belt in tech writing
Next by Author: Change bars considered harmful (Was: Re: The worst doc problem ever?)
Previous by Thread: Pilot Editing Study?
Next by Thread: RE: Pilot Editing Study?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads