Re: amusing? docs story

Subject: Re: amusing? docs story
From: "Eric Dunn" <dunn -dot- eric -dot- l -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "Sandy Harris" <sandyinchina -at- gmail -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 13:55:36 -0400

You unfortunately can't document to protect against blatant stupidity.

If the operator is really that stupid, do you think they're really making
the mistake because of strict adherence to the manuals wording and grammar?

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity!

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

amusing? docs story: From: Sandy Harris

Previous by Author: Re: documenting signal paths
Next by Author: Re: Change bars considered harmful (Was: Re: The worst doc problem ever?)
Previous by Thread: amusing? docs story
Next by Thread: Forum on conditional text in FrameMaker (7.2 or 8.0)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads