What do you guys think of STCs new definition for technical writer?

Subject: What do you guys think of STCs new definition for technical writer?
From: "Borowik, Kristy" <Kristy_Borowik -at- lcca -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 09:11:35 -0400

Yesterday I started a debate amongst the STC board of directors, trying
to get them to change their proposed definition to include the word
"ensure" rather than the word "assure." Merriam Webster clearly states
that the word "assure" "distinctively implies the removal of doubt or
suspense from a person's mind." So how can they possibly use the word in
their definition? A few of the members agree with me. One has changed it
in the survey they sent out yesterday, but this morning I received an
e-mail from the director of communications that makes me think the
discussion is not over. He simply thinks the word means something else.
He said it means "to give likelihood to." Nowhere could I find that
definition. I seriously think he made it up. I'm curious about what you
all think of both the debate and the definition.

My co-worker and I are concerned with the sole mention of equipment. Is
it not leaving out the biggest chunk of technical communicators in the
software field (and others)?

The definition: Develop and design instructional and informational tools
needed to assure safe, easy, proper and complete use of technical goods.
Combines multi-media knowledge and strong communication skills with
technical expertise to educate across the entire spectrum of users'
abilities, technical experience, and visual and auditory capabilities."

Of course it also bothers me that the serial comma is not used in the
second line. But I have yet to do a formal survey to see how many of us
use it and how many don't. I was under the impression that more do than
don't, but I have only my experience with the STC tech editing SIG to go
by.

And then shouldn't technical experience also be plural as the other
items in that series, for logic and parallelism? Oh this STC group just
hurts my head!

Kristy Borowik

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: What do you guys think of STCs new definition for technical writer?
Next by Author: Re: Adding "notes" pages to a reference manual?
Previous by Thread: RE: What do you guys think of STCs new definition fortechnical writer?
Next by Thread: RE: What do you guys think of STCs new definition for technical writer?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads