Re: Commute/Flex work options a Deal breaker?

Subject: Re: Commute/Flex work options a Deal breaker?
From: "Suzanne Chiles" <suzchiles -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: Lauren <lauren -at- writeco -dot- net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:03:59 -0700

This article appeared in the New York Times a few months ago. I have talked
to several friends who work for IBM and say that it's working fantastically
for them. Their happiness is up and their productivity is way up.


On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Lauren <lauren -at- writeco -dot- net> wrote:

> > From: Keith Hood
> > that would address the managements' concerns
> "managements'"? Is that the possessive of "managements"? I didn't know
> that the plural for "management" was "managements."
> I guess I'm having a sarcastic Monday.
> > Some bosses would resist
> > the idea of remote working because they are concerned that
> > workers would not really do all the hours that are billed.
> In reality, companies should not pay people to work x hours, they should
> pay
> people for deliverables, but the hourly scheme helps keep employees from
> being ripped off. An hourly scheme can be based on deliverables. For
> example, if managers used a metric of some sort to determine how long a
> certain job should take and an employee is taking longer than what is
> expected, then there is a performance issue. If an employee works faster
> than expected and produces the same quality of work as the slower employee,
> then the metric should be re-calibrated.
> When work requires creative, analytical, or other skills that are difficult
> to effective calibrate as a metric, then management should become more
> accepting of permitting employee latitude and measure the value of work
> according to the value of the deliverables. If this means that an employee
> wants to work naked from home without a camera and will be more effective
> and economical (saves fuel costs and liability insurance) than employees
> who
> work in an office, then management should accept this plan without the
> requirement of spy equipment.
> Each case of a telecommuting employee should be independently evaluated
> because it is impossible to standardize human nature. Some people perform
> better in an office environment, while others suffer in the same
> environment.
> Lauren
Suzanne Chiles
suzchiles -at- gmail -dot- com
I tweet as Homescribe on Twitter

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity!

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: Commute/Flex work options a Deal breaker?: From: Keith Hood
RE: Commute/Flex work options a Deal breaker?: From: Lauren

Previous by Author: RE: Documentation Management System Recommendation
Next by Author: Personal Attacks WAS: My complaint about the tedious immortal thread WAS: Techwriter Lawsuit
Previous by Thread: RE: Commute/Flex work options a Deal breaker?
Next by Thread: Re: Commute/Flex work options a Deal breaker?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads