RE: A new level of spam?

Subject: RE: A new level of spam?
From: "Bonnie Granat" <bgranat -at- granatedit -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:04:49 -0400

Yes, I am getting those same spam e-mails. Something is allowing it to
escape the normal junk filters, so I have been creating my own rules.


Bonnie Granat
http://www.GranatEdit.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> techwr-l-bounces+bgranat=granatedit -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+bgranat=granatedit -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l
> .com] On Behalf Of Guy K. Haas
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 9:14 PM
> To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: A new level of spam?
>
> Hey gang,
>
> Lately, my Mozilla Thunderbird mail client has been letting a
> lot of cr*p
> through its Bayesian filters, not marking it as spam. Lots
> of "Brittany
> Spears nude...." and "CNN alerts" and "MSNBC alerts" and
> "Acai cleanse"
> trash.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ComponentOne Doc-To-Help gives you everything you need to author and
publish quality Help, Web, and print content. Perfect for technical
authors, developers, and policy writers. Download a FREE trial.
http://www.componentone.com/DocToHelp/

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

References:
A new level of spam?: From: Guy K. Haas

Previous by Author: RE: levels of detail -- are we beyond this?
Next by Author: RE: marginally on-topic: Question about Fairness doctrine
Previous by Thread: Re: A new level of spam?
Next by Thread: Re: A new level of spam?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads