Fw: Fairness doctrine - applied to internet

Subject: Fw: Fairness doctrine - applied to internet
From: Diane Brennan <dalaine00 -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:17:02 -0700 (PDT)





----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Diane Brennan <dalaine00 -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 11:16:42 AM
Subject: Re: Fairness doctrine - applied to internet


The Democratic platform has nothing on it about starting a fairness doctrine for the Internet. But it DOES endorse net neutrality and complete freedom to publish any content without restrictions. The Democratic platform is written by members of the party to provide guidelines of our principles so that our leaders know what we expect when they craft legislation. So at the caucus that I ran in my city, every person at the caucus had an opportunity to write something to include in the platform. We had a few hundred suggestions for the platform. The platform committee from our county compiled all the suggestions from the districts into a larger platform that was sent to the state. Our district sent a technical writer to serve on the platform committee. Those suggestions were sent to the state to another platform committee. And this week, our state platform is being compiled into the national platform.

So if there is a fairness doctrine being discussed, I know for a fact that it isn't by the Democratic Party. In the many meetings I've attended in the last eight months through this process of moving towards the national convention, this idea was never, ever raised. Since most of us involved in the political process in Washington state are in software, there is no way we would let something like that get through. It would be impossible to regulate such a thing and it would destroy Internet content businesses. Microsoft and hundreds of smaller internet, software, and hardware companies carry the economy of this state. There is no way we do something to destroy our economy (especially since we are ranked third in the nation for positive business climate). You need to use common sense on this issue.

If you're concerned, you can look at all legislation currently under consideration by looking at THOMAS: http://thomas.loc.gov/



----- Original Message ----
From: "McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>
To: Diane Brennan <dalaine00 -at- yahoo -dot- com>
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 10:49:24 AM
Subject: RE: Fairness doctrine - applied to internet


My post was preceded by one that compiled quotations
from government personnel and thinktank/lobbyist folks at least making the
connection.

Such things are always easier to head off
than to reverse, once they collect a head of steam.

Of course, it might all be just steam and
hot air, but ... it has the potential to affect the livelihoods of many of us.



________________________________

From:Diane Brennan
[mailto:dalaine00 -at- yahoo -dot- com]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008
13:41
To: McLauchlan, Kevin;
techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: Fairness doctrine -
applied to internet

And I'd like to remind everybody that there is no
legislation being discussed that would control content on the Internet. There
is no "fairness doctrine" for the Internet. The only control on
content that you need to worry about is if you put slanderous comments on a
blog because you can then be sued.

----- Original Message ----
From: "McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 10:07:11 AM
Subject: RE: Fairness doctrine - applied to internet

Unlike phone service providers, ISPs cannot hold customers to long,
onerous contracts. If you've been bright enough (exercised a bit of
forethought) to have your e-mail addresses and web-hosting, etc. done by
third parties, then you can pull the plug on your ISP tomorrow. The most
you'll pay is the cost of a month of service. So, rather than have
government impose itself onto the issue of throttling... thereby
infallibly invoking the "law of unintended consequences", why not let
customers just vote with their feet... and their wallets?

Obviously, people are capable of discovering (and announcing) that
this-or-that ISP is engaging in deceptive and dishonest practices, so
there's a business opportunity, as well - become the watchdog.
Everybody else can use your info to decide whether to stay with their
current ISP or to become part of the dreaded "churn". Next
thing you
know, ISPs will be posting their "traffic shaping" policies, as a
competition tool - both their own statements about what they do (and
intend to do) and the statements of "disinterested" or neutral third
parties... watchdogs and consumer advocates.

What you don't want is the government exercising control over content.
Costs have been dropping in the internet biz for years. Internet service
is the next thing to free. Sure, I'll hear from some students and poor
people that it's nothing like free, but if you've been around for more
than a few years and compare what you get for your dollar today with
what you could get in (say) 1990, the difference is staggering, and
favorable to you the consumer.

The moment government takes a direct, regulatory interest in content, as
opposed to infrastructure and bandwidth issues, the cost trend will
reverse. The first cost will be the huge expansion of the bureaucracy -
after all, the internet is a huge thing - not only will they need tens
of thousands of bureaucrats to respond to all the complaints about
unfairness, they'll need thousands more just to examine traffic and
decide whether the US
government has jurisdiction. Well, it will have
jurisdiction (regardless of the origin of the content) when the content
flows through US ISPs on its way to you. The second cost will be the
paperwork burden associated with compliance. The third will be the cost
of lawyers and other protection (for the ISPs) against the regulators
and people using the regulators for malicious purposes.

With government regulating content, censorship will not be far behind.
Right now, anybody can set up a website, blog, vlog, etc., to hold forth
their beliefs and opinions about almost anything, and to counter anybody
else's website that promulgates opinions that they don't like... and it
costs pennies.

There are already laws about "hate", libel/slander, defamation, fraud
and so on. Massive government intervention in content is "a bad
thing".
The possibility of intervention by government being (or remaining)
anything but "massive" is non-existent. Ask the netizens of China how
well that's working out for them.

Char J-T probably likes to have her HATT matrix be "complete" and
accurate and widely applicable and useful... but how would she like it
if she was forced to include every little piece of code that anybody
demanded be included, AND had to deal with people filing formal
complaints because their little 2MB shareware helplet was shown at a
disadvantage compared with Flare and Doc2Help?

Some of you folks who have sites and blogs about tools and how to get
the best use out of them might find yourselves obliged to give "equal
time" to competing products, or to allow representatives of those
competing products equal space on your site or blog.

Imagine how people who post about the proper use of English (or any
other language) would be required to contort themselves.

Imagine how many would just give up when compliance issues began to
appear everywhere. Imagine how any hint of non-compliance would open up
anybody to costly civil suits.

On the other hand, if the task of producing a compliant website, blog,
etc. became truly onerous, only the most dedicated would even bother,
which would certainly cut down on the volume of dreck out there... hmmm
... silver linings are everywhere, aren't they? :-)

- Kevin



The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer without copying
or disclosing it.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ComponentOne Doc-To-Help gives you everything you need to author and
publish quality Help, Web, and print content. Perfect for technical
authors, developers, and policy writers. Download a FREE trial.
http://www.componentone.com/DocToHelp/

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as dalaine00 -at- yahoo -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/dalaine00%40yahoo.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer without copying
or disclosing it.



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ComponentOne Doc-To-Help gives you everything you need to author and
publish quality Help, Web, and print content. Perfect for technical
authors, developers, and policy writers. Download a FREE trial.
http://www.componentone.com/DocToHelp/

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Re: Fairness doctrine - applied to internet
Next by Author: RE: A new level of spam?
Previous by Thread: Re: Fairness doctrine - applied to internet
Next by Thread: RE: Fairness doctrine - applied to internet


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads