Re: AT&T Tech Comm Fail

Subject: Re: AT&T Tech Comm Fail
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:39:27 -0700

I didn't see her suggest it wasn't deliberately "not user-friendly."

Gene Kim-Eng

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean Brierley" <sbrierley -at- Accu-Time -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 11:16 AM
Subject: RE: AT&T Tech Comm Fail

> Why do you assume it was intended to be user friendly? I don't. It
> sounds like AT&T quite understood what they were doing.


ComponentOne Doc-To-Help gives you everything you need to author and
publish quality Help, Web, and print content. Perfect for technical
authors, developers, and policy writers. Download a FREE trial.

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity!

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


RE: AT&T Tech Comm Fail: From: Sean Brierley

Previous by Author: Re: WaH
Next by Author: Re: "usable" screen captures
Previous by Thread: RE: AT&T Tech Comm Fail
Next by Thread: Re: AT&T Tech Comm Fail

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads