RE: Concision?

Subject: RE: Concision?
From: "Pinkham, Jim" <Jim -dot- Pinkham -at- voith -dot- com>
To: "Odile Sullivan-Tarazi" <odile -at- mindspring -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:57:20 -0500

I think the New Oxford Guide editors should go back to Orwell's
"Politics and the English Language" and dispense with words such as
"concision" altogether. But I have no wish to start a dictionary or
style skirmish. This was, as I said, just a good-natured tweak.


-----Original Message-----
From: Odile Sullivan-Tarazi [mailto:odile -at- mindspring -dot- com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 9:46 AM
To: Pinkham, Jim
Cc: Cardimon, Craig; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: Concision?

No, I think he meant "concision," a more precise (and concise) word than

See, for instance, _The New Oxford Guide to Writing_ or _Style:
Toward Clarity and Grace, the latter of which devotes an entire chapter
to concision.


At 8:40 AM -0500 10/29/08, Pinkham, Jim wrote:
>"Concision," huh? I thought you meant "conciseness," and I had to go
>look the two up.
>Merriam-Webster dates "concision" back to the 14th century, but its
>first listed rendering is archaic, "a cutting up or off," and then the
>second rendering, of indeterminate origin, gets at conciseness.
>"Conciseness," on the other hand, dates to around 1590 and has the
>definition I suspect you meant: "marked by brevity of expression or
>So accurate, brief, clear -- that's what we value. Hmm...and someone
>just suggested law?? :)
>OK, enough tweaking...back to work.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: techwr-l-bounces+jim -dot- pinkham=voith -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+jim -dot- pinkham=voith -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On
>Behalf Of Cardimon, Craig
>Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 8:15 AM
>To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>Subject: RE: Career transition away from tech writing
>> I'm thinking about leaving the field of technical writing and I'm
>> interested in learning about the jobs other technical writers have
>> transitioned to. Project management, training, and user experience
>> to be the more common transitions, but are there other areas you may
>> have ventured into?
>> Thank you.
>I would bet this comes up more often than one might think. How about
>field that values concision, clarity, and precision. To these I add
>attention to detail and the ability to organize one's thoughts.


ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals.

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control!

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


RE: Career transition away from tech writing: From: Cardimon, Craig
Concision?: From: Pinkham, Jim
Re: Concision?: From: Odile Sullivan-Tarazi

Previous by Author: Concision?
Next by Author: RE: Concision?
Previous by Thread: Re: Concision?
Next by Thread: RE: Concision?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads