TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Onsite or on-site? From:Ned Bedinger <doc -at- edwordsmith -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:42:19 -0800
Chris Morton wrote:
> Onsite or on-site?
> Thogh I know both are correct, I believe the former has seen enough common
> usage since it was coined in the '60s so as to warrant it being usede
> without hypenation.
...Then you pick up a copy of The New Yorker magazine and notice that
they do the full treatment, with hyphen and diaeresis (no umlaut, pls.)
I'm not sure what that says about them, but I do avoid the obvious
reaction--after all, any serious publication with such a passion for
great features (even great cartoons) cannot possibly also have its head
firmly wedged, can it?
Personally, when I see co-Åperate with the hyphen and diaeresis, I count
it as a sign that staid ivy-educated ivory tower-niks control the
editorial policy. But on another plane, it strikes me also as sort of an
exotic European affect.
Diacritical marks in general give me acute curiosity-inspired tramp
steamer fantasies. I want to travel the world over just to hear WTF all
those dots and swashes, accents and rings, all the jots and tittles and
ligatures of written language actually _do_ to have become so
painstakingly reproduced billions and trillions of times, every time a
word is written.
Anyway, I generally don't give 'cooperate' any hyphen or whatever, I
just write it and try to imagine that special someone who will fumble it
so badly that they have to move along to the next word. I try to
encourage reading skills by making that next word one that is likewise
encumbered with missing diacriticals, like 'naive' or 'reenact'. I teach
them to learn to read. And don't we all?
Have fun reading,
doc -at- edwordsmith -dot- com
ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals. http://www.doctohelp.com
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-