TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
McLauchlan, Kevin wrote:
> I'm curious where you think we differ.
> When I compare the primary meanings from both dictionaries, it's the
> final phrase that brings out the nasty connotation.
That certainly is an understatement. It seals the deal on those
But here's something else. when I sat down last night with my aging
book-club edition of the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), I discovered
that I was the one blinkered by preconceptions. The definition from your
Concise Oxford is the same as OED, but OED traces it back to a deeper
well, through first appearances in written English in the mid 1800s,
then to French political philosophy before that, and ultimately to
Italian, where it originated. As it happened, opportunistic people were
the ones who had to set aside their own opinions and preferences in
order to fulfill their roles as political actors who made public policy
by balancing many interests. IOW, the principles that opportunists are
said to disregard are /t/h/e/i/r/ /o/w/n/ /p/e/r/s/o/n/a/l/
/pr/r/i/n/c/i/p/l/e/s/. The opportunists of yore were more like
dedicated public servants than rapacious scalliwags. If, that is, the
OED is to be believed. Myself, I'm down with it.
> When I read "especially regardless of principle", that's just a Brit's
> phrasing of "with little regard to principle..."
I wonder if the much maligned/much admired Italian political philosopher
Machiavelli had anything to say about opportunistic behavior?
> In other words, the "regardless of principle" or "with little regard to
> principle" are inserted to highlight the fact that we are talking about
> behavior that is natural to flora and fauna, but which we humans think
> should be tempered (among ourselves) by application of ethical
> principles. . . and isn't, when the word "opportunistic" is correctly
I agree. If opportunism ever stood apart from the opportunites and
actors, it would be colorless, odorless, tasteless. But OMG, the
historical context is savory. It blows me away.
ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals. http://www.doctohelp.com
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-