RE: "advance" vs "advanced"

Subject: RE: "advance" vs "advanced"
From: "McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>
To: "Stuart Burnfield" <slb -at- westnet -dot- com -dot- au>, "Techwr-l" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:24:47 -0500

> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> techwr-l-bounces+kevin -dot- mclauchlan=safenet-inc -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+kevin.mclauchlan=safenet->
inc -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of Stuart Burnfield
> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 6:49 PM
> To: Techwr-l
> Subject: Re: "advance" vs "advanced"
> I'm with Mark--"advanced" is either ambiguous or meaningless.
> I like "Advance Processing" a little better than "Advanced
> Processing",
> but I like "preprocessing" a lot better than either.
> > The processing is just a set of automated modifications,
> > and if the customer hasn't purchased this product,
> > the users will need to do those steps manually.
> So now you have scope to distinguish between automatic preprocessing
> (or server preprocessing) and manual preprocessing.

I can't recall the name of the comedian (and I saw him on tube just last
week), but he did a brief rant on the use of "pre-" this and "pre-"

It's not pre-digested. If it's pre-digested, then it's... digested,
isn't it?
It's not pre-approved. Your mortgage application is either approved or
denied, isn't it?

Are you pre-pregnant?

But, I suppose a case can be made that if your frammistan is
pre-jiggered, then it has not so much been jiggered already, as it's
been jiggered in preliminary (tentative? slapdash? haphazard?) fashion.

I'll go with 'advance' as the best option in front of 'processing'.

- Kevin
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer without copying
or disclosing it.


ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals.

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control!

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


Re: "advance" vs "advanced": From: Stuart Burnfield

Previous by Author: RE: "advance" vs "advanced"
Next by Author: RE: Wiki as a final output of the documentation?
Previous by Thread: Re: "advance" vs "advanced"
Next by Thread: Re: "advance" vs "advanced"

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads