TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Which is more acceptable From:Milan Davidovic <milan -dot- lists -at- gmail -dot- com> To:salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com Date:Fri, 3 Apr 2009 17:18:07 -0400
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Chris Morton <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> I concur. It's *their* rules if we're describing Windows OSes and apps. In
> relation to documenting web-based apps, I think I'd still follow their lead
> (M$) given the predominance of Windows machines running the browser. This
> presumes that the user(s) is already somewhat indoctrinated to the M$ way
> and its terminology (although I wouldn't place any bets on this).
Are we talking about Windows and Web here though? If so then MS
clearly does set the standard -- as you say, it's their OS.
ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals. http://www.doctohelp.com
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-