Re: proper terms/usage

Subject: Re: proper terms/usage
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:26:13 -0700

I don't recall "Spectrum" saying what the next step was going to be
after everybody voted, but it does appear from the last post that the
decision was made based on the dialog here and not by consulting the
SMEs further.

In a situation where the terms are essentially interchangeable and I
don't have a preference myself, I would be more than content to tell a
couple of dueling SMEs that neither of their choices is better than the
other, hand them a pair of virtual nerf bats and let them duke it out.
It's more entertaining than flipping a coin (which is what I'd tell them
I'm going to do if they don't reach a consensus) and I prefer to save my
energy for times when I actually care about the result.

Gene Kim-Eng

----- Original Message -----
From: "Combs, Richard" <richard -dot- combs -at- Polycom -dot- com>
I just don't think a competent, self-respecting tech writer should be in
a position where two SMEs decide between them what the content of the
manual should be, and all the tech writer does is "make it look pretty."


ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals.

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control!

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:

Re: proper terms/usage: From: Craig Haiss
RE: proper terms/usage: From: Combs, Richard
Re: proper terms/usage: From: Gene Kim-Eng
RE: proper terms/usage: From: Combs, Richard

Previous by Author: Re: proper terms/usage
Next by Author: Re: Post-interview: "We'll call you"
Previous by Thread: RE: proper terms/usage
Next by Thread: RE: proper terms/usage

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads