TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> I dislike both those options. Eons ago, I was taught to
> write experience
> descriptions using sentences with an implied subject (I):
Isn't an implied subject a form of passive voice?
It is certainly an example of the root of the problem, which is the lack of a Formal form in the English language. In German, for example, we would have all the usual tools of language available to us as long as we used "Sie". In Spanish, it's "usted". We don't have those options, so we have to mess around with fairly artificial ways of dancing around the problem.
I'm sorry, I see no evidence that this is effective. I agree that the bullet point form is handy, but in standard American English, especially Midwestern dialect, the need for artificially constructed formal structure does not appear necessary.
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-