Re: OT: Cheese or font?

Subject: Re: OT: Cheese or font?
From: Bill Swallow <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: Stuart Burnfield <slb -at- westnet -dot- com -dot- au>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:46:59 -0400

I dunno, I think some of the docs I've read over the years deserve to
be typed up in a good and stinky Limburger.

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Stuart Burnfield <slb -at- westnet -dot- com -dot- au> wrote:
> Or *is it* OT? As professional technical communicators, surely it's essential that we don't mix these up:

Bill Swallow

Twitter: @techcommdood

Available for contract and full time opportunities.

STC Ideas:

Free Software Documentation Project Web Cast: Covers developing Table of
Contents, Context IDs, and Index, as well as Doc-To-Help
2009 tips, tricks, and best practices.

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control!

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:

OT: Cheese or font?: From: Stuart Burnfield

Previous by Author: Re: Where are the good conferences?
Next by Author: Re: Turning online help into training materials
Previous by Thread: OT: Cheese or font?
Next by Thread: Taking a slightly different tone

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads