RE: A little respect for "unvalidated"

Subject: RE: A little respect for "unvalidated"
From: "Dan Goldstein" <DGoldstein -at- riverainmedical -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:16:32 -0400

In our world, "validate" means "confirm by examination and provision of
objective evidence that the particular requirements for a specific
intended use can be consistently fulfilled."

There are variations of this, such as: "ensure that the product is
capable of meeting the requirements for the specified application or
intended use."

There are more specific definitions for validating processes and
validating device design, but the general idea of "intended use" is
retained: Prove that you get what you expect to get.

If your device works perfectly, but your customers can't use it
correctly, then it cannot be validated.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Handy, David [mailto:dhandy -at- Informatica -dot- com]
> Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 10:55 AM
> To: Combs, Richard; Dan Goldstein; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: RE: A little respect for "unvalidated"
> I can interpret the verb "validate" in one of two ways:
> To check the validatity of...
> To affirm the validatity of...
> Dan, can I ask which if either meaning your readers adhere to?

This message contains confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing, copying, electronic storing or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us, by replying to the sender, and delete the original message immediately thereafter. Thank you.


Free Software Documentation Project Web Cast: Covers developing Table of
Contents, Context IDs, and Index, as well as Doc-To-Help
2009 tips, tricks, and best practices.

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control!

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


A little respect for "unvalidated": From: Dan Goldstein
RE: A little respect for "unvalidated": From: Combs, Richard
RE: A little respect for "unvalidated": From: Handy, David

Previous by Author: RE: A little respect for "unvalidated"
Next by Author: RE: A little respect for "unvalidated"
Previous by Thread: RE: A little respect for "unvalidated"
Next by Thread: Re: A little respect for "unvalidated"

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads