Re: data storage terminology

Subject: Re: data storage terminology
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:41:49 -0700

There's no uncertainty. In the context of data storage, TB means 2^40.
The people who pretend that it means 10^12 are simply lying.

I'm surprised there hasn't been a class-action lawsuit along the lines
of the one that forced monitor manufacturers to change their ways some
years back:

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Fred Ridder <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com> wrote:
> ... do I
> agree with NIST that something like them is necessary to eliminate
> uncertainly in statements of data storage capacity? Yes, I do.
> -Fred Ridder

Free Software Documentation Project Web Cast: Covers developing Table of
Contents, Context IDs, and Index, as well as Doc-To-Help
2009 tips, tricks, and best practices.

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control!

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


data storage terminology: From: Sam Lightbourne
Re: data storage terminology: From: Peter Neilson
Re: data storage terminology: From: Robert Lauriston
RE: data storage terminology: From: Fred Ridder

Previous by Author: Re: data storage terminology
Next by Author: Re: A little respect for "unvalidated"
Previous by Thread: RE: data storage terminology
Next by Thread: RE: data storage terminology

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads