RE: A little respect for "unvalidated"

Subject: RE: A little respect for "unvalidated"
From: "McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>
To: Dan Goldstein <DGoldstein -at- riverainmedical -dot- com>, "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:58:00 -0400

Dan Goldstein said:

> Neither bartleby.com nor dictionary.com recognizes "unvalidated" as a
> word. Its meaning is clear enough to me, and certainly
> distinct from the
> suggested "invalidated."
>
> Wiktionary, bless its little heart, does recognize this useful word.

In our capacity as a rowdy and fractious gang of technical ... er... communicators, what do we recognize as the limits on our English use of prefixes and suffixes, given a base word that we wish to modify?

Do some members of this list regard the list of examples attached to the dictionary entry for "un(-)" to be a complete and exclusive list? Which dictionary is authoritative, then, and why?

FWIW, I have a far more liberal interpretation than that (regarding the list as examples not as a complete and non-extensible prescription), but I'm prepared to be shown to be wrong.



If y'all were talking about, say Hardware Security Modules, and you wanted to talk about the ones that had been validated by NIST as being compliant with the FIPS 140-2 standard, and the HSMs that had NOT been so validated, how would you refer to the have-not-been-validated bunch? "Unvalidated"? "Non-validated"? Other? Why?

It's DEFINITELY not "INvalidated", which has its own specific meaning, as Dan rightly observes.


- Kevin

The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer without copying
or disclosing it.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Free Software Documentation Project Web Cast: Covers developing Table of
Contents, Context IDs, and Index, as well as Doc-To-Help
2009 tips, tricks, and best practices.
http://www.doctohelp.com/SuperPages/Webcasts/

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


Follow-Ups:

References:
A little respect for "unvalidated": From: Dan Goldstein

Previous by Author: RE: Use of Optional in instructions
Next by Author: RE: A little respect for "unvalidated"
Previous by Thread: RE: A little respect for "unvalidated"
Next by Thread: RE: A little respect for "unvalidated"


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads