RE: Dual Monitors [WAS: RE: Approach and estimation for acleanup/conversion product - Word docs to FM and OLH]

Subject: RE: Dual Monitors [WAS: RE: Approach and estimation for acleanup/conversion product - Word docs to FM and OLH]
From: Fred Ridder <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: <richard -dot- combs -at- polycom -dot- com>, <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:23:17 -0400


But that's what Peter said, because .0144 (your number) equals 1.44% (his number).

But his reasoning is wrong, because to calculate the result of a 12% increase on top of a 12% increase, you don't multiply the increase percentages (12%). You multiply the *increased quantities* (112%). So it would be 1.12 x 1.12 = 1.2544 = 125.44%

-Fred Ridder

> Subject: RE: Dual Monitors [WAS: RE: Approach and estimation for acleanup/conversion product - Word docs to FM and OLH]
> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:59:48 -0600
> From: richard -dot- combs -at- Polycom -dot- com
> To: neilson -at- windstream -dot- net; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Peter Neilson wrote:
>
> > That should square the 12% increase! Wow!!! Lemmesee... about [quickly
> > multiplies .12 by .12] 1.44%.
>
> Math challenged, Peter? .12 x .12 = .0144
>
> (Think of it this way: a tenth of a tenth is a hundredth.)
>
> Disclaimer: I'm not trying to start a math kerfuffle. ;-)

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Free Software Documentation Project Web Cast: Covers developing Table of
Contents, Context IDs, and Index, as well as Doc-To-Help
2009 tips, tricks, and best practices.
http://www.doctohelp.com/SuperPages/Webcasts/

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


Follow-Ups:

References:
Re: Approach and estimation for a cleanup/conversion product - Word docs to FM and OLH: From: David Neeley
Dual Monitors [WAS: RE: Approach and estimation for a cleanup/conversion product - Word docs to FM and OLH]: From: Paul Hanson
Re: Dual Monitors [WAS: RE: Approach and estimation for a cleanup/conversion product - Word docs to FM and OLH]: From: Wade Courtney
Re: Dual Monitors [WAS: RE: Approach and estimation for a cleanup/conversion product - Word docs to FM and OLH]: From: Peter Neilson
RE: Dual Monitors [WAS: RE: Approach and estimation for acleanup/conversion product - Word docs to FM and OLH]: From: Combs, Richard

Previous by Author: RE: FrameMaker: Adding Header Row to Imported Table
Next by Author: RE: Dual Monitors [WAS: RE: Approach and estimation for acleanup/conversion product - Word docs to FM and OLH]
Previous by Thread: RE: Dual Monitors [WAS: RE: Approach and estimation for acleanup/conversion product - Word docs to FM and OLH]
Next by Thread: RE: Dual Monitors [WAS: RE: Approach and estimation foracleanup/conversion product - Word docs to FM and OLH]


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads