Re: .pdf vs. .html

Subject: Re: .pdf vs. .html
From: Gary Schnabl <gSchnabl -at- LivernoisYards -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:57:56 -0400

Robert Lauriston wrote:
> I wouldn't recommend FrameMaker without knowing more about the current
> source format and the document, since it's expensive and has a steep
> learning curve. You might be the first person I've ever heard
> compliment its ease of use.
> OpenOffice works with Word files, generates good PDFs with named
> destinations, and is free.
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:13 PM, <quills -at- airmail -dot- net> wrote:
>> Adding to my last post on this topic, the tool you use for creation of
>> you documents is very important. To create PDFs and use utilities to do
>> this efficiently, I'd recommend a full featured product like Adobe
>> FrameMaker. Even producing HTML I lean toward FrameMaker because of it's
>> ease of use in design and structure.
>> You could use Word, but that is a kludge, not a solution. ...

OpenOffice works with importing/exporting Word 2003 DOC files, but not
Word 2007 DOCX files without being first down-converted to a DOC file on
import, and losing whatever DOCX formatting and features introduced via
Word 2007.

My first full-time technical editing assignment involved working six
months 100% in (conventional--not structured) FrameMaker documents that
were distilled into Acrobat PDFs, and +I found both applications fairly
easy to use. I found structured FrameMaker somewhat easy also, but,
obviously, a fair amount of learning is involved.

OpenOffice does have some difficulties (and requires kludges) with
x-refs across separate subdocuments with its master documents. OTOH,
x-refs are very trouble-free with FrameMaker. Of the three, I would rate
FrameMaker, OOo, and Word 2007 1, 2, 3--in that order--for large bookmaking.

As to OOo's PDF generation, is there an Adobe PDF printer-file add-on
available for OOo for "printing" to a printer file?


Free Software Documentation Project Web Cast: Covers developing Table of
Contents, Context IDs, and Index, as well as Doc-To-Help
2009 tips, tricks, and best practices.

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control!

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


.pdf vs. .html: From: Anne Woolson
Re: .pdf vs. .html: From: quills
Re: .pdf vs. .html: From: Robert Lauriston

Previous by Author: RE: Tech Pubs vs MarCom
Next by Author: Re: .pdf vs. .html
Previous by Thread: Re: .pdf vs. .html
Next by Thread: Re: .pdf vs. .html

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads