Re: OmniPage vs. FineReader

Subject: Re: OmniPage vs. FineReader
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:24:30 -0800

Second on that. Going to Word first would just make more mess to clean up.

On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 1:27 AM, David Neeley <dbneeley -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> ... probably do best by conversion to plain text, then importing
> that to Frame for formatting and such. ...

Are you looking for one documentation tool that does it all? Author,
build, test, and publish your Help files with just one easy-to-use tool.
Try the latest Doc-To-Help 2009 v3 risk-free for 30-days at:

Help and Manual 5: The all-in-one help authoring tool. Full support for
team authoring with multi-user editing - both directly and in combination
with VSS-compatible source control systems.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:

Re: OmniPage vs. FineReader: From: David Neeley

Previous by Author: Re: Doc Design and Convention ( was TECHWR-L Digest, Vol 48, Issue 27)
Next by Author: Re: Cheap (under $1,000 or so) Doc Mgt Software Recommendations?
Previous by Thread: Re: OmniPage vs. FineReader
Next by Thread: Editor's Revenge

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads