Re: Doc Design and Convention - to address Gene's take on

Subject: Re: Doc Design and Convention - to address Gene's take on
From: Chris Despopoulos <despopoulos_chriss -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 11:21:22 -0800 (PST)

I've just been working for the last number of years in environments where a developer would have serious explaining to do if she stepped outside of the agreed bounds. Maybe that's one of the benefits of Agile... If the story isn't approved, you don't work on it. If you want to noodle in some corner of the code, you put the idea into the backlog and see if it ever moves into a sprint. And in my current position, although it isn't Agile we do wind up being similar. It's a smaller company, so top-level people vet everything. I'm surprised that the venerable tech institutions (Sun, Microsoft, Adobe, Cisco, IBM...) would not have arrived at a similar approach. Projects become much more predictable, and the features that do make it into the implementation get the benefit of more focused attention. It's been a long time since I've seen a loose cannon wreak havoc on a project plan as you describe.

cud

*************************
You seem to be assuming that these features were
officially approved :-> I can't answer for all
extraneous features but I've certainly seen
instances where developers were "in that section
of code anyway" and decided to implement something
on their own that they were sure everyone would
love. Or where they based some design decisions
on what they themselves thought would be cool
rather than what market research told them.
**************************




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Are you looking for one documentation tool that does it all? Author,
build, test, and publish your Help files with just one easy-to-use tool.
Try the latest Doc-To-Help 2009 v3 risk-free for 30-days at:
http://www.doctohelp.com/

Help and Manual 5: The all-in-one help authoring tool. Full support for
team authoring with multi-user editing - both directly and in combination
with VSS-compatible source control systems. http://www.helpandmanual.com/

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Re: Doc Design and Convention ( was TECHWR-L Digest, Vol 48,
Next by Author: Re: Using Synergy configuration management system with Frame
Previous by Thread: Re: Doc Design and Convention - to address Gene's take on
Next by Thread: Re: Doc Design and Convention - to address Gene's take on


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads