Re: Bad Documentation and Linux

Subject: Re: Bad Documentation and Linux
From: <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
To: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 17:15:05 -0600

> result never got read.
> "Why? 'Oh, it's too big,'" she recounted.

I was told my doc was no good because there were too many steps. Well, there *were* 16 steps! The product required the user to do every one of them. And indeed, I actually had overlooked an important in-between step. There were really 17.

The product was later revised to work with just one step.

For Linux (or any Unix) if you want to do command-line stuff, you have to wade through hairy documentation that tells you about hairy options you'd rather ignore. Personally, I like Unix command lines and am willing to read man pages. There *are* "Linux for the Terminally Drain Bamaged" books out there, I'm sure. Probably nobody reads them, too.


Are you looking for one documentation tool that does it all? Author,
build, test, and publish your Help files with just one easy-to-use tool.
Try the latest Doc-To-Help 2009 v3 risk-free for 30-days at:

Help & Manual 5: The all-in-one help authoring tool. True single- sourcing --
generate 8 different formats and as many different versions as you need
from just one project. Fast and intuitive.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


Re: Bad Documentation and Linux: From: Robert Lauriston

Previous by Author: RE: Chapter-page numbering, reasons for
Next by Author: RE: Redneck step of the day
Previous by Thread: Re: Bad Documentation and Linux
Next by Thread: Re: Bad Documentation and Linux

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads