Re: WritersUA Tools Survey

Subject: Re: WritersUA Tools Survey
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:29:19 -0800

This is the first I've heard of the survey.

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Bill Swallow <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
>> I think they should have included javadoc, Doxygen, and Doc++. Seems
>> likely to me that they're considerably more popular than Document!X.
> Did you write them in with your survey response?
> --
> Bill Swallow
> Twitter: @techcommdood
> Blog:
> LinkedIn:
> Available for contract and full time opportunities.
> ------------------------------------------------
> STC Ideas:
> Join:

Are you looking for one documentation tool that does it all? Author,
build, test, and publish your Help files with just one easy-to-use tool.
Try the latest Doc-To-Help 2009 v3 risk-free for 30-days at:

Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at:

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


WritersUA Tools Survey: From: Mike Sawyer
Re: WritersUA Tools Survey: From: Robert Lauriston
Re: WritersUA Tools Survey: From: Bill Swallow

Previous by Author: Re: Acrobat 9 pro and Word 2003: Links and TOC don't work
Next by Author: Re: wiki vs blog
Previous by Thread: Re: WritersUA Tools Survey
Next by Thread: Re: WritersUA Tools Survey

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads