Re: RE: Offensive language

Subject: Re: RE: Offensive language
From: Nancy Allison <maker -at- verizon -dot- net>
To: Jim -dot- Pinkham -at- voith -dot- com
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:55:51 -0600 (CST)

Thank you, Jim! I, too, hope that your post provides a graceful end to the thread.

Never have I felt righteous outrage on behalf of bulls before, but I do now! Poor dears, to be so maligned . . .


On Mar 5, 2010, Pinkham, Jim <Jim -dot- Pinkham -at- voith -dot- com> wrote:

Well done, David, and Friday at last! Hopefully, this proves a graceful
landing point to bring this week's passionate and interesting (but now
rather protracted) discussion to a close.


Use Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word, or HTML and
produce desktop, Web, or print deliverables. Just write (or import)
and Doc-To-Help does the rest. Free trial:

Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at:

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:

Previous by Author: RE: Top 10 mistakes unstructured FrameMaker Users make in content beforetranslation
Next by Author: Pleasurable typo
Previous by Thread: Re: Terms & Conditions
Next by Thread: RE: API doc question

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads