RE: Semantic(s)

Subject: RE: Semantic(s)
From: Stuart Burnfield <slb -at- westnet -dot- com -dot- au>
To: Techwr-l <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:27:31 +0800 (WST)

Madelyn wrote:
> I will go to my grave kicking myself for using the wrong terms
> in conversation and emails;

If that's the worst thing you have to kick yourself for,
you will have led an exemplary life :^)


Use Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word, or HTML and
produce desktop, Web, or print deliverables. Just write (or import)
and Doc-To-Help does the rest. Free trial:

Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at:

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:

Previous by Author: TW to develop a guide for new developers
Next by Author: Jealousy in the TW Workplace?
Previous by Thread: Re: Semantic(s)
Next by Thread: Managers in the Waterloo Ontario area

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads