re: Metrics

Subject: re: Metrics
From: Damien Braniff <Damien -dot- Braniff -at- asg -dot- com>
To: "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:57:05 +0000

About 10 yrs ago I did a couple surveys as part of my MA, surveying both those who create and those who use documentation. Summary:

Doc Producers
With the proliferation of software that offers DTP capabilities basic page design is now applied to most documentation.

Most documentation (60%) was not produced by a technical writer.
In 70% of cases no user analysis is performed before the documentation is produced.
Testing the documentation usually takes place as part of product beta-testing. In 40% of cases there is no (formal) testing of the documentation at all.
The majority of respondents (60%) felt that the documentation could be improved by having it professionally written and designed.

When asked to rate the importance of the docs (1=V important to 10=we have to provide some!), most were in the 1-4 range with only one 10 (I guess they were in a very niche market!)

The overall feeling is that documentation is generally usable but that it varies greatly from product to product - no real consistency across the board.
A âbadâ experience with the documentation is likely (90% of users) to put the user off using it again (and docs in general).

Users (58%) prefer hard-copy documentation. If it is online then it is often printed out to read/use.
Very few users always read the documentation. The general response was that âit depends on the productâ or âonly when Iâm stuckâ.

Most users (65%) see the documentations as an integral part of the product. Poor documentation therefore reflects badly on the product as well.

The âlook and feelâ of the documentation is important. Documentation that is well presented is more likely to be read.

Documentation varies greatly from product to product. While documentation was seen as being usable, in almost 25% of cases it was deemed to have inaccuracies and be irrelevant. In over 50% of cases it was deemed to be incomplete.

Hopefully things have moved on from then but sometimes I wonder! :-)

Damien Braniff
Sr. Technical Writer
damienb -at- asg -dot- com
Waterfront PLaza
8, Lagan Bank Road
Belfast, N. Ireland
Tel: +44 (0) 28.9072.3124
Fax: +44 (0) 28.9072.3324
ASG | Beyond BSMâ
ï Â Please consider the environment before printing this email.


Use Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word, or HTML and
produce desktop, Web, or print deliverables. Just write (or import)
and Doc-To-Help does the rest. Free trial:

Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at:

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:

Previous by Author: Re: MyTextTools
Next by Author: "Popular" Careers for English Majors
Previous by Thread: Re: Metrics
Next by Thread: Re: AW: How do hiring companies view TW resumes?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads